Judge allows border wall on tribe land
Archived — this story has rotated out of today’s deck. It is kept here in full.
The gist
A federal judge allowed Trump's 62-mile border wall on Tohono O'odham land without tribal consent.
The ruling tests tribal sovereignty and border security priorities.
Background
The Tohono O'odham Nation, a federally recognized sovereign tribe with about 37,000 members, filed a lawsuit in June to block construction of a border wall on its reservation, which spans roughly 62 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border in southern Arizona. The tribe argues that decades of cooperation with federal authorities have already reduced illegal crossings by more than 95%, making a wall unnecessary. The Trump administration contends the border is U.S. government property and that the wall is needed for national security.
How it unfolded
- Jun 2026The Tohono O'odham Nation filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to block wall construction.
- Aug 3, 2026Federal Judge Reggie B. Walton allowed the Trump administration to proceed with wall construction near Presidio, Texas, despite environmental concerns.
- Aug 10, 2026The Tohono O'odham Nation warned border wall crews off tribal land, saying non-tribal members are restricted from entering.
- Aug 14, 2026A federal judge ruled against the tribe's request to halt construction, allowing the 62-mile wall to proceed without tribal consent.
Who’s saying what
- Official
- The Trump administration argues the border is U.S. government property and the wall poses no environmental threat, citing national security.
- Tribe
- Tohono O'odham Chairman Verlon Jose called the wall a 'wasteful political gimmick,' noting existing measures have cut crossings by over 95%.
- Environmentalists
- Environmental groups argued the wall could damage levees and cause flooding, as in the Presidio case.
Still unverified
The tribe's claim that illegal crossings have dropped by more than 95% is based on tribal statements and has not been independently verified.