Supreme Court allows Trump ballroom work
已归档 —— 这条已轮出今日牌堆，完整内容在此保留。
一句话看懂
Chief Justice John Roberts allowed Trump's $400M White House ballroom construction to continue for now.
The ruling is temporary, pending full Supreme Court review of a historic preservation lawsuit.
背景
The Trump administration is building a 90,000-square-foot ballroom on the site of the former East Wing of the White House, a project costing $400 million. The National Trust for Historic Preservation sued in December, arguing the president lacks authority to proceed without congressional approval. A district court judge ordered a halt to above-ground construction, but Chief Justice Roberts issued an administrative stay to allow work to continue while the Supreme Court considers the case.
来龙去脉
- Dec 2025National Trust for Historic Preservation sued over the ballroom project.
- Mar 2026U.S. District Judge Richard Leon ruled against Trump, saying construction must stop unless it involves safety and security.
- Aug 7, 2026Appeals court affirmed Leon's ruling but gave the government 14 days to seek Supreme Court relief.
- Aug 14, 2026Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to intervene, arguing the project is vital for national security.
- Aug 18, 2026Preservation group urged the Supreme Court to suspend the project, accusing the administration of trying to 'outrun judicial review.'
- Aug 21, 2026Chief Justice John Roberts issued a temporary stay allowing construction to continue while the full court considers next steps.
各方怎么说
- Administration
- The ballroom is part of an integrated military complex vitally required by national security, and halting work would harm ongoing construction.
- Preservation Group
- The president lacks legal authority to build without Congress, and the project's design is aesthetically objectionable.
- Judge Leon
- No statute comes close to giving the president the authority he claims, so above-ground work must stop.
待核实
The claim that the ballroom is 'vitally required by national security' is disputed by the preservation group and has not been independently verified.