Humans reading Copilot prompts alarmed
已归档 —— 这条已轮出今日牌堆，完整内容在此保留。
一句话看懂
Human contractors reviewing Microsoft Copilot prompts say they are flooded with sexualized image requests.
The exposure raises privacy questions for consumer Copilot users whose uploads are reviewed.
背景
Microsoft hires human contractors to rate the quality of AI-generated image edits, and those workers review users' prompts and uploaded photos. Contractors told reporters they are inundated with lewd and sexually explicit requests, including upskirt photos and images placing women in sexual positions. The reports follow earlier revelations that OpenAI also uses contractors to review ChatGPT users' real prompts. Consumer Copilot lacks the stronger data protections Microsoft extends to enterprise users.
来龙去脉
- Sep 28, 2026404 Media reports that human contractors hired to improve Microsoft's Copilot are reviewing users' prompts and uploaded images, based on internal contractor documents.
- Sep 28, 2026Contractors describe being bombarded with lewd or sexually explicit photo editing requests, including upskirt photos and putting women into sexual positions.
- Sep 28, 2026Futurism and other outlets report hundreds of contractors are reviewing users' image editing prompts, with many saying they are inundated with dark and sexually explicit requests.
各方怎么说
- Contractors
- One anonymous contractor said faces are always uncensored and many prompts are sexual in nature and dubiously consensual.
- Contractors
- One contractor said they recoiled after reviewing pro-anorexia content, and another described seeing eight upskirt photos in a single image set.
- Microsoft
- Microsoft guidelines stress the importance of human intuition when determining which AI edits are superior, asking contractors to trust their instincts about which images look better in side-by-side comparisons.
待核实
Contractor accounts described repeated exposure to disturbing and sexualized material that quality-review assignments would not typically be expected to involve; contractor discussions reviewed by 404 Media allegedly described repeated exposure to sexualized requests, imagery involving young girls, upskirt photos, animal-sacrifice images, and fetish content. Several contractors have reported instances where they inadvertently encountered content that appeared illegal.